Quail Hollow East Condominium Association v. Donald J. Scholz Company

273 S.E.2d 454, 301 N.C. 527
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 2, 1980·Published

Opinion

273 S.E.2d 454 (1980)
301 N.C. 527

QUAIL HOLLOW EAST CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. SCHOLZ COMPANY and Harold Cooler, Defendants.
Harold COOLER, Third Party Plaintiff,
v.
INDOOR COMFORT OF RALEIGH, INC., a corporation, and Holland Construction Company, Inc., a corporation, Third Parry Defendants.
Harold COOLER, Third Party Plaintiff,
v.
REA BROTHERS, INC. Additional Third Party Defendant.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 1980.

Jones, Hewson & Woolard, Charlotte, for Harold Cooler.

Weinstein, Sturges, Odom, Bigger, Jonas & Campbell, Charlotte, for plaintiff.

Johnson, Gamble & Shearon, Raleigh, for third-party defendant, Indoor Comfort of Raleigh, Inc.

Bradley, Guthery, Turner & Curry, Charlotte, for third-party defendant, Holland Construction Company, Inc.

Warren, Dunkle & McKaig, Charlotte, for third-party defendant, Rea Brothers, Inc.

Petition by Harold Cooler, for discretionary review under G.S. § 7A-31, 47 N.C.App. 518, 268 S.E.2d 12. Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quail Hollow East Condominium Association v. Donald J. Scholz Company, 273 S.E.2d 454, 301 N.C. 527 (N.C. 1980).

273 S.E.2d 454 (Quail Hollow East Condominium Association v. Donald J. Scholz Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quail Hollow East Condominium Association v. Donald J. Scholz Co.
268 S.E.2d 12 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)