Quackenbush v. Town of Palm Beach

151 So. 2d 348, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3528
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 1963·No. No. 3437·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The review sought by appellant relates to an order in effect denying his petition for rehearing and not to the final decree of dismissal. Such a review cannot be had, because if this court is to determine the correctness of the ruling on the petition,, it is necessary that the final decree and the record upon which it is based be considered also. Since this requires consideration’ of a decree not here made the subject of attack, there accordingly arises no jurisdictional foundation upon which this court could afford to appellant the requested review. The appeal must therefore be dismissed. See Klemenko v. Klemenko, Fla., 1957, 97 So.2d 11; Finley v. Finley, Fla. 1958, 103 So.2d 191; McNary v. Hudson, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 73; Oxford v. Polk Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lakeland, Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 603.

Appeal dismissed.

SHANNON, C. J., and KANNER, J.„ and WIGGINTON, JOHN, Associate-Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quackenbush v. Town of Palm Beach, 151 So. 2d 348, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

151 So. 2d 348 (Quackenbush v. Town of Palm Beach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bennett v. Zager
387 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Colburn v. Highland Realty Co.
153 So. 2d 731 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)