Quach v. Waldbaums, Inc.

202 A.D.2d 562, 610 N.Y.S.2d 807
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 202 A.D.2d 562 (Quach v. Waldbaums, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quach v. Waldbaums, Inc., 202 A.D.2d 562, 610 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated April 28, 1992, which, inter alia, denied its motion to transfer the venue of the action to Suffolk County, and granted the plaintiffs’ cross motion to transfer the venue of the action to Queens County.

[563]*563Ordered that the order is reversed, with costs, the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, is directed to transfer the file of the action to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County.

Because, as the plaintiffs have correctly conceded, their choice of venue in the first instance was improper, they forfeited their right to select the place of venue (see, Cenziper v Gross, 175 AD2d 226; Papadakis v Command Bus Co., 91 AD2d 657; Siegel, NY Prac § 123, at 189 [2d ed]; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac jj 511.04). Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting the plaintiffs’ cross motion and denying the motion of the defendant, which is a corporation, to transfer the venue of the action to Suffolk County, where its principal office is located (see, CPLR 503 [c]). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. ELRAC, Inc.
272 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Ward v. National Car Rental
226 A.D.2d 449 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Tomasulo v. Berland
217 A.D.2d 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Geraghty v. CIGNA Property & Casualty Insurance
216 A.D.2d 268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 562, 610 N.Y.S.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quach-v-waldbaums-inc-nyappdiv-1994.