Qihui Huang v. Culpepper

Fourth Circuit

Qihui Huang v. Culpepper

446 F. App'x 660

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 21, 2011

DocketNo. 11-1452

StatusPublished

This text of 446 F. App'x 660 (Qihui Huang v. Culpepper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Qihui Huang v. Culpepper, 446 F. App'x 660 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Qihui Huang appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for an extension of time in which to file a second motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huang v. Culpepper, No. 8:10-cv-00089-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 20, 2011). We deny all of Huang’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Qihui Huang appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for an extension of time in which to file a second motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huang v. Culpepper, No. 8:10-cv-00089-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 20, 2011). We deny all of Huang’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 F. App'x 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/qihui-huang-v-culpepper-ca4-2011.