Qihui Huang v. Culpepper

Fourth Circuit

Qihui Huang v. Culpepper

446 F. App'x 660

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2011·No. No. 11-1452·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Qihui Huang appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for an extension of time in which to file a second motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huang v. Culpepper, No. 8:10-cv-00089-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 20, 2011). We deny all of Huang’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Qihui Huang appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for an extension of time in which to file a second motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Huang v. Culpepper, No. 8:10-cv-00089-DKC (D.Md. Apr. 20, 2011). We deny all of Huang’s pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Qihui Huang v. Culpepper, 446 F. App'x 660 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

446 F. App'x 660 (Qihui Huang v. Culpepper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.