Qiaoli Zhong v. Holder

381 F. App'x 716
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2010
Docket05-70745
StatusUnpublished

This text of 381 F. App'x 716 (Qiaoli Zhong v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Qiaoli Zhong v. Holder, 381 F. App'x 716 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Qiaoli Zhong, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection un *717 der the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir.2008), and we grant the petition for review, and remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the agency’s adverse credibility determination. See Bandari v. INS, 227 F.3d 1160, 1165 (9th Cir.2000). The inconsistencies as to whether the police officers who beat Zhong were in plainclothes, and the discrepancies between Zheng’s testimony and the hospital report regarding bruises on his forehead, are minor discrepancies in relation to Zheng’s otherwise detailed, consistent testimony of the beating, and his documentation of other more serious injuries. See id. at 1166-67 (minor discrepancies, in light of otherwise consistent testimony, could not form the basis for an adverse credibility determination).

Accordingly, we grant the petition for review, and remand for the agency to consider Zhong’s claims for relief, taking his testimony as true. See Soto-Olarte v. Holder, 555 F.3d 1089, 1093-96 (9th Cir. 2009); see also INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura
537 U.S. 12 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Soto-Olarte v. Holder
555 F.3d 1089 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Husyev v. Mukasey
528 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
381 F. App'x 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/qiaoli-zhong-v-holder-ca9-2010.