Qarana v. North Pointe Ins. Co.
This text of 699 N.W.2d 305 (Qarana v. North Pointe Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Qarana
v.
North Pointe Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 127488, COA: 244797.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument: (1) whether defendant was required to use "reasonable diligence" in securing the cooperation of the insured; and, if so (2) whether a question of fact existed regarding whether defendant used "reasonable diligence" in securing the cooperation of the insured; (3) whether defendant must establish that it was prejudiced by the insured's noncooperation; and, if so (4) whether a question of fact existed regarding whether defendant was prejudiced by the insured's noncooperation. The parties may *306 file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting restatement of arguments made in application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
699 N.W.2d 305, 473 Mich. 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/qarana-v-north-pointe-ins-co-mich-2005.