QAF Technologies, Inc.

CourtArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals
DecidedApril 10, 2019
DocketASBCA No. 61875
StatusPublished

This text of QAF Technologies, Inc. (QAF Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
QAF Technologies, Inc., (asbca 2019).

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of -- ) ) QAF Technologies, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 61875 ) Under Contract No. M67004-l 7-P-l 071 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Theodore P. Watson, Esq. Cheryl Emerson Adams, Esq. Watson & Associates. LLC Aurora, CO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq. Navy Chief Trial Attorney Nicole R. Best, Esq. Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE SHACKLEFORD

On September 30. 2017. the Department of the Navy. United States Marine Corps. Blount Island Command (USMC or government) awarded Contract No. M67004-l 7-P-l 071 (the contract) to QAF Technologies, Inc. (QAF or appellant). The contract was for delivery of dry freight and refrigerated cargo containers.

The contract incorporated by full text Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.212-4, CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS-COMMERCIAL ITEMS (JAN 2017).

By letter dated September 21, 2018, the contracting officer terminated the contract for cause for QAF's failure to deliver the containers by the delivery date required by the contract. QAF timely appealed the decision by notice dated November 12, 2018, to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA or Board). The appeal was docketed as ASBCA No. 61875.

The parties have settled their dispute and have jointly requested that the Board issue a decision incorporating the terms of their agreement as set forth in their March 25, 2019 "RULE 19(d) STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT."

In accordance with Board Rule l 9(d) of the ASBCA and the stipulation of the parties. it is the Board's decision. in the nature of a consent judgment, that:

I I I I) The termination for cause is converted to a no-cost termination for convenience of the government;

2) The Board makes no (zero) monetary award to appellant;

3) Any claim for termination costs or other costs associated with or arising out of the contract by appellant is waived.

Dated: April 10, 2019 +/J-~------- ~i/ _:_Wl RICHARD SHACKLEFORD Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

I concur I concur

OWEN C. WILSON ALEXANDER YO Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61875, Appeal of QAF Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
QAF Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/qaf-technologies-inc-asbca-2019.