Q Aviation Mgt., LLC v. Alterna Capital Partners LLC

2018 NY Slip Op 7053
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 23, 2018
Docket7419 653910/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 7053 (Q Aviation Mgt., LLC v. Alterna Capital Partners LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Q Aviation Mgt., LLC v. Alterna Capital Partners LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 7053 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Q Aviation Mgt., LLC v Alterna Capital Partners LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 07053)
Q Aviation Mgt., LLC v Alterna Capital Partners LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 07053
Decided on October 23, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 23, 2018
Renwick, J.P., Richter, Kahn, Gesmer, Singh, JJ.

7419 653910/13

[*1]Q Aviation Management, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Alterna Capital Partners LLC, Defendant-Respondent.


Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York (Leelle Bruerea Krompass of counsel), for appellant.

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, New York (Andrew P. Foster of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered July 31, 2017, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly determined that, under the plain language of the parties' agreement, plaintiff was not entitled to commissions (see generally W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 162 [1990]. The letters of interest plaintiff obtained for defendant's aircraft were non-binding expressions of interest only, not offers or "bona fide offers." The court properly declined to consider extrinsic evidence of the parties' intentions or expert opinion as to the meaning of the unambiguous

terms (see generally South Rd. Assoc., LLC v International Bus. Machs. Corp., 4 NY3d 272, 278 [2005]; see also News Am. Mktg., Inc. v Lepage Bakeries, Inc., 16 AD3d 146, 148 [1st Dept 2005]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: OCTOBER 23, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

South Road Associates, LLC v. International Business Machines Corp.
826 N.E.2d 806 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. Giancontieri
566 N.E.2d 639 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
News America Marketing, Inc. v. Lepage Bakeries, Inc.
16 A.D.3d 146 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 7053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/q-aviation-mgt-llc-v-alterna-capital-partners-llc-nyappdiv-2018.