Pytel v. New Jersey Transit Authority
This text of 267 A.D.2d 155 (Pytel v. New Jersey Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered on or about October 6, 1998, inter alia, granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record supports the court’s finding that the adult plaintiffs conduct in becoming intoxicated, ignoring “no trespassing” signs, jumping four or five feet from the train platform to enter a darkened recess under the platform, and going to sleep there, approximately one foot away from railroad tracks that plaintiff believed to be active, was so reckless as to constitute the sole legal cause of his injuries (see, Olsen v Town of Richfield, 81 NY2d 1024; see also, de Pena v New York City Tr. Auth., 236 AD2d 209, 210, lv denied 90 NY2d 808). Moreover, there is no support for plaintiffs claim that the train that struck him was negligently operated. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Williams and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D.2d 155, 700 N.Y.S.2d 19, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pytel-v-new-jersey-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1999.