Pyszka v. State
This text of 400 So. 2d 486 (Pyszka v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The judgment of conviction for possession of contraband drugs is affirmed on the authority of Oishi v. State, 400 So.2d 480 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Here, the appellant’s carry-on bag was opaque and could not be visualized through the x-ray machine at the airport boarding gate, so the security guard opened it to check its contents. The discovery of the drugs was not the product of an illegal search and thus the trial court was correct in denying the motion to suppress.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
400 So. 2d 486, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyszka-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.