Pyszka v. State

400 So. 2d 486, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19889
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 20, 1981·No. No. 79-1056/T4-547·Published

Opinions

ORFINGER, Judge.

The judgment of conviction for possession of contraband drugs is affirmed on the authority of Oishi v. State, 400 So.2d 480 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Here, the appellant’s carry-on bag was opaque and could not be visualized through the x-ray machine at the airport boarding gate, so the security guard opened it to check its contents. The discovery of the drugs was not the product of an illegal search and thus the trial court was correct in denying the motion to suppress.

AFFIRMED.

EVANS, VERNON W., Jr., Associate Judge, concurs. DAUKSCH, C. J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pyszka v. State, 400 So. 2d 486, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19889 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

400 So. 2d 486 (Pyszka v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oishi v. State
400 So. 2d 480 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)