Pyszka v. Pyszka

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pyszka v. Pyszka

481 So. 2d 486, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2483, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16557

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 5, 1985

DocketNo. 85-199

StatusPublished

This text of 481 So. 2d 486 (Pyszka v. Pyszka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pyszka v. Pyszka, 481 So. 2d 486, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2483, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16557 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Gina Pyszka appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which awarded her $3,000 per month in permanent periodic alimony, one-half of the assets from the sale of designated properties after payment of all debts, including the mortgage on the marital home, and the marital home. The husband was awarded his partnership interest in his law firm and the assets remaining after all debts, including appellant’s attorney’s fees, are paid.

We have carefully studied the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in fashioning an equitable, if not perfect, award. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So.2d 542 (Fla.1985); Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Mullins v. Mullins, 460 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gina Pyszka appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage which awarded her $3,000 per month in permanent periodic alimony, one-half of the assets from the sale of designated properties after payment of all debts, including the mortgage on the marital home, and the marital home. The husband was awarded his partnership interest in his law firm and the assets remaining after all debts, including appellant’s attorney’s fees, are paid.

We have carefully studied the record on appeal and find that the trial court did not abuse its broad discretion in fashioning an equitable, if not perfect, award. Marcoux v. Marcoux, 464 So.2d 542 (Fla.1985); Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Mullins v. Mullins, 460 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

481 So. 2d 486, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2483, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16557, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyszka-v-pyszka-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack