Pyles v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Pyles v. State

59 S.E. 193, 3 Ga. App. 29, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 543

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1907·No. 789·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

One witness testified positively to facts and circumstances-which proved guilt. Six witnesses contradicted this one witness as-to the facts and as to the existence of some of the circumstances. The jury, in the exercise of its right, believed the testimony of the-[30]*30one witness, and the trial judge approved the verdict. This court can not interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of gaming, from city court of Polk county — Judge Irwin. October 4, 1907.

Submitted November 11, Decided November 14, 1907. Mundy & Mundy, for plaintiff in error. P. R. Turner, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, O. J.

One witness testified positively to facts and circumstances-which proved guilt. Six witnesses contradicted this one witness as-to the facts and as to the existence of some of the circumstances. The jury, in the exercise of its right, believed the testimony of the-[30]*30one witness, and the trial judge approved the verdict. This court can not interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of gaming, from city court of Polk county — Judge Irwin. October 4, 1907.

Submitted November 11, Decided November 14, 1907. Mundy & Mundy, for plaintiff in error. P. R. Turner, solicitor, contra.

Pyles v. State, 59 S.E. 193, 3 Ga. App. 29, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 543 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

59 S.E. 193 (Pyles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related