Pyle v. State
658 So. 2d 1234, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8696, 1995 WL 488184
Opinion
Richard Allen Pyle appeals his sentences imposed upon violation of probation arguing he was not awarded six months’ credit for time served in jail on the front end of the split sentences. As the state properly concedes error, the sentences are REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED for resen-tencing in accordance with the guidelines set forth by the supreme court in Tripp v. State, 622 So.2d 941 (Fla.1993). See also Perry v. State, 639 So.2d 1090 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Bryant v. State, 622 So.2d 1047 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pyle v. State, 658 So. 2d 1234, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8696, 1995 WL 488184 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
658 So. 2d 1234 (Pyle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tripp v. State
622 So. 2d 941 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Perry v. State
639 So. 2d 1090 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Bryant v. State
622 So. 2d 1047 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)