Pyle v. Pyle

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pyle v. Pyle

375 So. 2d 1088, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 14, 1979

DocketNo. NN-309

StatusPublished

This text of 375 So. 2d 1088 (Pyle v. Pyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pyle v. Pyle, 375 So. 2d 1088, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage ordered the husband to pay alimony, child support for his two minor daughters, aged 14 and 8 years, and to “maintain his current life insurance for the benefit of said children during their dependency.” We agree with the husband that it was error to order him to maintain all his life insurance, valued at $302,000, for the benefit of the children during their minority. His obligation to support his daughters, including his agreement to pay for an undergraduate education at a state university for each of them, will total approximately one-third of the present value of the life insurance. The case is remanded for modification consistent with Higgins v. Higgins, 348 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of dissolution of marriage ordered the husband to pay alimony, child support for his two minor daughters, aged 14 and 8 years, and to “maintain his current life insurance for the benefit of said children during their dependency.” We agree with the husband that it was error to order him to maintain all his life insurance, valued at $302,000, for the benefit of the children during their minority. His obligation to support his daughters, including his agreement to pay for an undergraduate education at a state university for each of them, will total approximately one-third of the present value of the life insurance. The case is remanded for modification consistent with Higgins v. Higgins, 348 So.2d 48 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 So. 2d 1088, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyle-v-pyle-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack