Pyle v. Lloyd

1915 OK 889, 152 P. 1073, 52 Okla. 328, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 287
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 9, 1915·No. 5451·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action was instituted to recover upon a promissory note given for building material, and to foreclose a lien upon real estate for the amount thereof. There was a default judgment *329 in the trial court. In this court the cause was assigned for oral argument, but default was also made here, and there has been no brief filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error.

We have examined the record and are convinced that the appeal, is frivolous and without merdit, and has been prosecuted for delay. Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co., 43 Okla. 440, 143 Pac. 190.

We, therefore, recommend that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pyle v. Lloyd, 1915 OK 889, 152 P. 1073, 52 Okla. 328, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 287 (Okla. 1915).

1915 OK 889 (Pyle v. Lloyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co.
1914 OK 450 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)