Pyle v. Lloyd

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Pyle v. Lloyd

1915 OK 889, 152 P. 1073, 52 Okla. 328, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 287

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 9, 1915

Docket5451

StatusPublished

This text of 1915 OK 889 (Pyle v. Lloyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pyle v. Lloyd, 1915 OK 889, 152 P. 1073, 52 Okla. 328, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 287 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

GALBRAITH, C.

This action was instituted to recover upon a promissory note given for building material, and to foreclose a lien upon real estate for the amount thereof. There was a default judgment *329 in the trial court. In this court the cause was assigned for oral argument, but default was also made here, and there has been no brief filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error.

We have examined the record and are convinced that the appeal, is frivolous and without merdit, and has been prosecuted for delay. Skirvin v. Bass Furniture & Carpet Co., 43 Okla. 440, 143 Pac. 190.

We, therefore, recommend that the judgment appealed from be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI