Pyle v. Dixon
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2023-2708
WILLIAM D. PYLE, Petitioner, v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Sec’y, Dept. of Corrections,
Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
May 29, 2024
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
William D. Pyle, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pyle v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).
Pyle v. Dixon (Pyle v. Dixon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)