Pyle v. Dixon

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 29, 2024
Docket2023-2708
StatusPublished

This text of Pyle v. Dixon (Pyle v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pyle v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2023-2708 _____________________________

WILLIAM D. PYLE,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Sec’y, Dept. of Corrections,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

May 29, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

ROBERTS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ William D. Pyle, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baker v. State
29 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pyle v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyle-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2024.