Pyle v. Altshul
4 A.2d 377, 125 N.J. Eq. 143, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 641
This text of 4 A.2d 377 (Pyle v. Altshul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pyle v. Altshul, 4 A.2d 377, 125 N.J. Eq. 143, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 641 (N.J. 1939).
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 10.
For reversal — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, PARKER, HEHER, PERSKIE, PORTER, JJ. 5. *Page 148
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 A.2d 377, 125 N.J. Eq. 143, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyle-v-altshul-nj-1939.