Pyeatt v. Cullen
454 So. 2d 17, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048
Opinion
This is an appeal from dismissal of an action to reform a mortgage to reflect counsel’s representations during settlement negotiations of a pending action.
Anne Cullen was not a party to the lawsuit brought against her husband, Richard, and a corporation jointly owned by the Cul-lens. As a result, the trial court correctly refused to reform the mortgage to reflect her collateral assignment of the mortgage securing the note signed by her husband.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pyeatt v. Cullen, 454 So. 2d 17, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
454 So. 2d 17 (Pyeatt v. Cullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCray v. Adams
529 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)