Pyeatt v. Cullen

454 So. 2d 17, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 17, 1984
DocketNo. 84-236
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 454 So. 2d 17 (Pyeatt v. Cullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pyeatt v. Cullen, 454 So. 2d 17, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from dismissal of an action to reform a mortgage to reflect counsel’s representations during settlement negotiations of a pending action.

Anne Cullen was not a party to the lawsuit brought against her husband, Richard, and a corporation jointly owned by the Cul-lens. As a result, the trial court correctly refused to reform the mortgage to reflect her collateral assignment of the mortgage securing the note signed by her husband.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCray v. Adams
529 So. 2d 1131 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
454 So. 2d 17, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyeatt-v-cullen-fladistctapp-1984.