Pyeatt v. Cullen
This text of 454 So. 2d 17 (Pyeatt v. Cullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from dismissal of an action to reform a mortgage to reflect counsel’s representations during settlement negotiations of a pending action.
Anne Cullen was not a party to the lawsuit brought against her husband, Richard, and a corporation jointly owned by the Cul-lens. As a result, the trial court correctly refused to reform the mortgage to reflect her collateral assignment of the mortgage securing the note signed by her husband.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
454 So. 2d 17, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyeatt-v-cullen-fladistctapp-1984.