Pyatt v. State
754 S.W.2d 27, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1024, 1988 WL 74072
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Omer Pyatt, Jr. appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court’s conclusions and judgment are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pyatt v. State, 754 S.W.2d 27, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1024, 1988 WL 74072 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
754 S.W.2d 27 (Pyatt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.