Pyatt v. Mercer

209 So. 2d 320, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5290
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 7, 1968·No. No. 2296·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellee moved to dismiss the suspensive appeal on the grounds that the defendant “failed to post a bond for a suspensive appeal as the law directs.” No further explanation of the reasons for the motion is given.

We find the record contains a suspensive appeal bond, which, on its face, is proper. The motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal is denied.

Motion to Dismiss denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pyatt v. Mercer, 209 So. 2d 320, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5290 (La. Ct. App. 1968).

209 So. 2d 320 (Pyatt v. Mercer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bourgeois v. Sazdoff
209 So. 2d 320 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968)