Pyatt v. Mercer

209 So. 2d 320, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5290
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 7, 1968
DocketNo. 2296
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 So. 2d 320 (Pyatt v. Mercer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pyatt v. Mercer, 209 So. 2d 320, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5290 (La. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellee moved to dismiss the suspensive appeal on the grounds that the defendant “failed to post a bond for a suspensive appeal as the law directs.” No further explanation of the reasons for the motion is given.

We find the record contains a suspensive appeal bond, which, on its face, is proper. The motion to dismiss the suspensive appeal is denied.

Motion to Dismiss denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bourgeois v. Sazdoff
209 So. 2d 320 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 So. 2d 320, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pyatt-v-mercer-lactapp-1968.