P.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

P.W. v. State

814 So. 2d 457, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16372, 2001 WL 1472637

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 21, 2001

DocketNo. 4D01-1160

StatusPublished

This text of 814 So. 2d 457 (P.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

P.W. v. State, 814 So. 2d 457, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16372, 2001 WL 1472637 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue raised by appellant in this appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence which was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The state concedes, and we agree, that appellant’s position has merit. Accordingly, we reverse the denial of both appellant’s motion to suppress and his motion to dismiss.

STONE, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue raised by appellant in this appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence which was obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The state concedes, and we agree, that appellant’s position has merit. Accordingly, we reverse the denial of both appellant’s motion to suppress and his motion to dismiss.

STONE, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

814 So. 2d 457, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16372, 2001 WL 1472637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pw-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack