Puzio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Puzio v. State

908 So. 2d 521, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10073, 2005 WL 1523386

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Puzio v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 969 So. 2d 1197 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2005·No. No. 4D05-1519·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Insofar as appellant’s claims included a sentencing challenge based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we note that this decision does not apply retroactively to appellant’s sentence which became final in 1998. See Hughes v. State, 901 So.2d 837 (Fla.2005).

KLEIN, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Insofar as appellant’s claims included a sentencing challenge based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we note that this decision does not apply retroactively to appellant’s sentence which became final in 1998. See Hughes v. State, 901 So.2d 837 (Fla.2005).

KLEIN, HAZOURI and MAY, JJ., concur.

Puzio v. State, 908 So. 2d 521, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10073, 2005 WL 1523386 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

908 So. 2d 521 (Puzio v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related