Puzey v. Broadwater

Fourth Circuit

Puzey v. Broadwater

437 F. App'x 258

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 5, 2011

DocketNo. 10-7745

StatusPublished

This text of 437 F. App'x 258 (Puzey v. Broadwater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Puzey v. Broadwater, 437 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Paul Puzey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puzey v. Broadwater, No. 1:10-cv-00060-JRG (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 13, 2010; filed Nov. 22, 2010 and entered Nov. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Paul Puzey appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puzey v. Broadwater, No. 1:10-cv-00060-JRG (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 13, 2010; filed Nov. 22, 2010 and entered Nov. 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

437 F. App'x 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puzey-v-broadwater-ca4-2011.