Puyallup Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Stevenson

Washington Supreme Court

Puyallup Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Stevenson

59 P. 504, 21 Wash. 604, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 334

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 2, 1899

DocketNo. 3035

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 P. 504 (Puyallup Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Puyallup Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Stevenson, 59 P. 504, 21 Wash. 604, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 334 (Wash. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action for unlawful detainer and the recovery of $24 damages. The defendants had judgment in the superior court, and plaintiff appealed. Subsequent to the taking of the appeal, possession of the premises was surrendered, so that the existing controversy embraces only a demand for the recovery of $24. We cannot entertain jurisdiction. Hice v. Orr, 16 Wash. 163 (47 Pac. 424) ; State Constitution, art. 4, § 4.

The motion to dismiss is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was an action for unlawful detainer and the recovery of $24 damages. The defendants had judgment in the superior court, and plaintiff appealed. Subsequent to the taking of the appeal, possession of the premises was surrendered, so that the existing controversy embraces only a demand for the recovery of $24. We cannot entertain jurisdiction. Hice v. Orr, 16 Wash. 163 (47 Pac. 424) ; State Constitution, art. 4, § 4.

The motion to dismiss is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 P. 504, 21 Wash. 604, 1899 Wash. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puyallup-light-heat-power-co-v-stevenson-wash-1899.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack