Putvin v. Joseph Davis, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Putvin v. Joseph Davis, Inc.

13 A.D.2d 721, 213 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 721 (Putvin v. Joseph Davis, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Putvin v. Joseph Davis, Inc., 13 A.D.2d 721, 213 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by inserting the word “supplemental” before the words “ verified bill of particulars ” and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: The order is modified in the manner stated, upon the understanding that the new bill of particulars will be a supplemental bill of particulars and that the original bill of particulars heretofore served in each case and rejected by the defendant’s attorney will be reserved. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term directing plaintiffs in the 11 actions to furnish to defendant Buffalo Electric Co. a further bill of particulars.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by inserting the word “supplemental” before the words “ verified bill of particulars ” and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: The order is modified in the manner stated, upon the understanding that the new bill of particulars will be a supplemental bill of particulars and that the original bill of particulars heretofore served in each case and rejected by the defendant’s attorney will be reserved. (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term directing plaintiffs in the 11 actions to furnish to defendant Buffalo Electric Co. a further bill of particulars.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, MeClusky and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 721, 213 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putvin-v-joseph-davis-inc-nyappdiv-1961.