Putnick v. H.M.C. Associates

197 A.D.2d 763, 602 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9832

This text of 197 A.D.2d 763 (Putnick v. H.M.C. Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Putnick v. H.M.C. Associates, 197 A.D.2d 763, 602 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Conway, J.), entered July 31, 1992 in Albany County, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ motion to confirm/restore this matter to the trial calendar.

We affirm. Plaintiffs have conceded that this matter was in fact struck from the trial calendar in January 1991 and, based upon our review of the record as a whole, we are unable to conclude that Supreme Court abused its discretion in restoring it.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr. and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 763, 602 N.Y.S.2d 727, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putnick-v-hmc-associates-nyappdiv-1993.