Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Putney v. Pass

Putney v. Pass

96 S.E. 341, 22 Ga. App. 450, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 384
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 12, 1918
Docket9459
StatusPublished

This text of 96 S.E. 341 (Putney v. Pass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Putney v. Pass, 96 S.E. 341, 22 Ga. App. 450, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 384 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Bloodwoeth, J.

Jhe grounds of the amendment to the motion for new trial are without merit. There is evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 S.E. 341, 22 Ga. App. 450, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putney-v-pass-gactapp-1918.