Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2)

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2)

181 A. 778, 320 Pa. 203, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 760

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 10, 1935·No. 2; Appeals, 147, 148, 150 and 151·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These appeals were argued together and will be determined in one opinion. They involve the same questions disposed of in Ernest A. Frey v. United Traction Co. of Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 196. We consider the records amended by marking the suits to the use (as stated in Frey’s Appeal).

*204 The orders appealed from are reversed, the records are remitted to the end that judgment he entered for the plaintiff for such sum as to right and justice may belong unless other legal or equitable cause be shown to the court below why such judgment should not be so entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These appeals were argued together and will be determined in one opinion. They involve the same questions disposed of in Ernest A. Frey v. United Traction Co. of Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 196. We consider the records amended by marking the suits to the use (as stated in Frey’s Appeal).

*204 The orders appealed from are reversed, the records are remitted to the end that judgment he entered for the plaintiff for such sum as to right and justice may belong unless other legal or equitable cause be shown to the court below why such judgment should not be so entered.

Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2), 181 A. 778, 320 Pa. 203, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 760 (Pa. 1935).

Pincite

181 A. 778 (Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related