Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2)

Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2)

181 A. 778, 320 Pa. 203, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 760
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 10, 1935
Docket2; Appeals, 147, 148, 150 and 151
StatusPublished

This text of 181 A. 778 (Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Putnam v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh (No. 2), 181 A. 778, 320 Pa. 203, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 760 (Pa. 1935).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These appeals were argued together and will be determined in one opinion. They involve the same questions disposed of in Ernest A. Frey v. United Traction Co. of Pittsburgh, 320 Pa. 196. We consider the records amended by marking the suits to the use (as stated in Frey’s Appeal).

*204 The orders appealed from are reversed, the records are remitted to the end that judgment he entered for the plaintiff for such sum as to right and justice may belong unless other legal or equitable cause be shown to the court below why such judgment should not be so entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frey v. U. T. Co. of Pittsburgh
181 A. 775 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 A. 778, 320 Pa. 203, 1935 Pa. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putnam-v-u-t-co-of-pittsburgh-no-2-pa-1935.