Putnam v. The United States Army Review Board Agency

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA LT. COL. (RET.) JOE A. PUTNAM, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Case No. CIV-22-305-G UNITED STATES ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY, ) Defendant. ORDER Now before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12), seeking dismissal of the claims raised in Plaintiff's original Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff has now timely filed an Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint and renders it of no legal effect. See Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, the pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED this 3rd day of January, 2023.

(Vauba B. Kodo United States District Judge