Putnam v. State
This text of Putnam v. State (Putnam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DARRELL PUTNAM, § § No. 714, 2014 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, STATE OF DELAWARE, § in and for Kent County § Cr. ID 1308008865 Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: March 25, 2015 Decided: March 27, 2015
ORDER
This 27th day of March 2015, it appears to the Court that, on March 10,
2015, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to appellant to show cause why this
appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and appendix
in this matter. The appellant has failed to respond to the notice to show cause
within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to
be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the within appeal is
DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr. Chief Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Putnam v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putnam-v-state-del-2015.