Putnam v. State
76 So. 468, 76 So. 409, 16 Ala. App. 172, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 227
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Putnam v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 Ala. App. 171 →
Opinion
The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of abusive language. _ The questions raised on this appeal are identical with the questions raised in the companion case against the same defendant. Mans Putnam v. State, ante, p. 171, 76 South. 408, present term. Under the authority of that case, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Putnam v. State, 76 So. 468, 76 So. 409, 16 Ala. App. 172, 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 227 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).
76 So. 468 (Putnam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Putnam v. State
76 So. 467 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1917)