Putnam v. Shelof
12 Johns. 435
Opinion
This being an action sounding in damages, the plaintiff below had a right to waive his claim for the excess, over 25 dollars ; and the exception to the jurisdiction is not weU taken. (Tuttle v. Maston, 1 Johns. Cas. 25. Ibid. 333.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Putnam v. Shelof, 12 Johns. 435 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1815).
12 Johns. 435 (Putnam v. Shelof) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Plunket v. Evans
50 N.W. 961 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
McManus v. Gregory
16 Mo. App. 375 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)