Putnam v. . Lincoln Safe Deposit Company
This text of 85 N.E. 1115 (Putnam v. . Lincoln Safe Deposit Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 191 N. Y. 166.)
Motion granted and remittitur amended so as to read: “ Interlocutory judgment affirmed, judgment of the Appellate Division, so far as it modified and affirmed the final judgment, reversed and a new trial ordered pursuant to the interlocutory judgment, before the court or before another referee as the court below shall determine; costs to abide the final award of costs.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 N.E. 1115, 191 N.Y. 542, 1908 N.Y. LEXIS 1165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putnam-v-lincoln-safe-deposit-company-ny-1908.