Putnam v. Interior Metal Manufacturing Co.
173 A.D. 967
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Putnam v. Interior Metal Manufacturing Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 169 A.D. 248 →
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Scott, Smith and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Putnam v. Interior Metal Manufacturing Co., 173 A.D. 967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
173 A.D. 967 (Putnam v. Interior Metal Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.