Putnam v. County of Steuben

61 A.D.3d 1372, 876 N.Y.S.2d 923
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Putnam v. County of Steuben. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 A.D.3d 1369
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 2009·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J), entered March 13, 2008. The order, among other things, granted in part defendant’s postjudgment motion to set aside the jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion in its entirety and reinstating the award of damages and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Putnam v County of Steuben (61 AD3d 1369 [2009]). Present—Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Putnam v. County of Steuben, 61 A.D.3d 1372, 876 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

61 A.D.3d 1372 (Putnam v. County of Steuben) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Putnam v. County of Steuben
61 A.D.3d 1369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)