Putnam, Jessie Carl v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 25, 2002
Docket01-01-01101-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Putnam, Jessie Carl v. State (Putnam, Jessie Carl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Putnam, Jessie Carl v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Opinion issued April 25, 2002









In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NOS. 01-01-01100-CR

01-01-01101-CR



JESSIE CARL PUTNAM, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 887032 and 886803



O P I N I O N

Appellant was charged with aggravated robbery and aggravated assault. He entered into a plea bargain agreement with the State in which the State would recommend that punishment be assessed at eight years incarceration in each case. Appellant signed written waivers of his right to appeal if the trial court accepted the plea bargain agreement.

Appellant pleaded guilty in each case, and the trial court followed the plea bargain agreement in assessing punishment. Despite having waived the right to appeal, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal in each case. We hold the appeals must be dismissed. Appellant's notices of appeal state that the appeals are for jurisdictional defects. However, it is apparent from the records that the trial court had jurisdiction, and the records before us support the presumption that the pleas were voluntary. Therefore, appellant's waivers of the right to appeal were effective. See Buck v. State, 45 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.); see also Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Bushnell v. State, 975 S.W.2d 641, 642-44 (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd); Littleton v. State, 33 S.W.3d 41, 43 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 2000, pet. ref'd).

Accordingly, we order the appeals dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Hedges, and Jennings.



Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanco v. State
18 S.W.3d 218 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Buck v. State
45 S.W.3d 275 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Littleton v. State
33 S.W.3d 41 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Bushnell v. State
975 S.W.2d 641 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Putnam, Jessie Carl v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putnam-jessie-carl-v-state-texapp-2002.