Putman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Putman v. State

7 Okla. Crim. 740

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 15, 1912·No. No. A-1221·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at one hundred and eighty days’ confinement in the county jail and a fine of five hundred dollars. We think that the evidence introduced by the state sustains the verdict of the jury. It is their province to settle all conflicts in the evidence. The questions of law presented have repeatedly been decided adversely to the contention of counsel. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at one hundred and eighty days’ confinement in the county jail and a fine of five hundred dollars. We think that the evidence introduced by the state sustains the verdict of the jury. It is their province to settle all conflicts in the evidence. The questions of law presented have repeatedly been decided adversely to the contention of counsel. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Putman v. State, 7 Okla. Crim. 740 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

7 Okla. Crim. 740 (Putman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.