Putman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Putman v. State

1912 OK CR 346, 124 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 15, 1912

DocketNo. A-1-1

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 346 (Putman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Putman v. State, 1912 OK CR 346, 124 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at one hundred and eighty days' confinement in the county jail and a fine of five hundred dollars. We think that the evidence introduced by the state sustains the verdict of the jury. It is their province to settle all conflicts in the evidence. The questions of law presented have repeatedly been decided adversely to the contention of counsel. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant was convicted for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law, and his punishment was assessed at one hundred and eighty days' confinement in the county jail and a fine of five hundred dollars. We think that the evidence introduced by the state sustains the verdict of the jury. It is their province to settle all conflicts in the evidence. The questions of law presented have repeatedly been decided adversely to the contention of counsel. The judgment of the lower court is therefore in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 346, 124 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 740, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.