Putman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Putman v. State

484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2016 WL 1211373

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 29, 2016·No. WD 78375·Published

Opinion

[894] ORDER

Per Curiam

Tony Putman appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to forcible rape, second-degree robbery, and two counts of kidnapping and was sentenced to a total of 40 years in prison. Putman contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion because he established that plea counsel misled him to believe that, if he pled guilty, he would receive a total sentence of only 20 years in prison. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[894] ORDER

Per Curiam

Tony Putman appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to forcible rape, second-degree robbery, and two counts of kidnapping and was sentenced to a total of 40 years in prison. Putman contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion because he established that plea counsel misled him to believe that, if he pled guilty, he would receive a total sentence of only 20 years in prison. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Putman v. State, 484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2016 WL 1211373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

484 S.W.3d 893 (Putman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.