Putman v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Putman v. State

484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2016 WL 1211373

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 29, 2016

DocketWD 78375

StatusPublished

This text of 484 S.W.3d 893 (Putman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Putman v. State, 484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2016 WL 1211373 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[894]*894ORDER

Per Curiam

Tony Putman appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to forcible rape, second-degree robbery, and two counts of kidnapping and was sentenced to a total of 40 years in prison. Putman contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion because he established that plea counsel misled him to believe that, if he pled guilty, he would receive a total sentence of only 20 years in prison. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[894]*894ORDER

Per Curiam

Tony Putman appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion after he pled guilty to forcible rape, second-degree robbery, and two counts of kidnapping and was sentenced to a total of 40 years in prison. Putman contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his post-conviction motion because he established that plea counsel misled him to believe that, if he pled guilty, he would receive a total sentence of only 20 years in prison. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

484 S.W.3d 893, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 307, 2016 WL 1211373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putman-v-state-moctapp-2016.