Putman v. State

126 S.E. 288, 33 Ga. App. 357, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 772
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1925
Docket15997
StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 288 (Putman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Putman v. State, 126 S.E. 288, 33 Ga. App. 357, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 772 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The judgment of the majority of this court is that the record contains no evidence authorizing the verdict. The writer does not concur in that judgment.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworlh, JJ., concur. Broyles, G. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 S.E. 288, 33 Ga. App. 357, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putman-v-state-gactapp-1925.