Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Putman v. Putman

Putman v. Putman

188 A.D.2d 1027, 592 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1992
StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 1027 (Putman v. Putman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Putman v. Putman, 188 A.D.2d 1027, 592 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court’s award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $500 was proper. In the exercise of our discretion, however, the award is increased by the amount of $256 to cover disbursements (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rósete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576, 590; Rados v Rados, 133 AD2d 536). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Brien v. O'Brien
489 N.E.2d 712 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
DeCabrera v. Cabrera-Rosete
518 N.E.2d 1168 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Rados v. Rados
133 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 A.D.2d 1027, 592 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/putman-v-putman-nyappdiv-1992.