Putman v. Putman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Putman v. Putman

188 A.D.2d 1027, 592 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 1992·Published

Opinion

Order unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court’s award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $500 was proper. In the exercise of our discretion, however, the award is increased by the amount of $256 to cover disbursements (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rósete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576, 590; Rados v Rados, 133 AD2d 536). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified in the exercise of discretion and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court’s award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $500 was proper. In the exercise of our discretion, however, the award is increased by the amount of $256 to cover disbursements (see, Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rósete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; O’Brien v O’Brien, 66 NY2d 576, 590; Rados v Rados, 133 AD2d 536). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J. — Counsel Fees.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Green, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Putman v. Putman, 188 A.D.2d 1027, 592 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14871 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

188 A.D.2d 1027 (Putman v. Putman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related