Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pustilnik v. Pustilnik

Pustilnik v. Pustilnik

24 A.D.2d 868, 264 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 1, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 868 (Pustilnik v. Pustilnik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pustilnik v. Pustilnik, 24 A.D.2d 868, 264 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

In a separation action, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 7, 1965, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 20 days after the entry of the order hereon. The complaint in this separation action fails to specify the “ time and place of each act complained of” (CPLR 3016, subd. [c]). Amplification by bill of particulars, as suggested by Special Term, is not a satisfactory alternative if the statute is to retain its effectiveness. (See Kurcz v. Kurcz, 13 A D 2d 954; Rizzi v. Rizzi, 279 App. Div. 676.) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodd v. Colbert
64 A.D.3d 982 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Tabib v. Tabib
56 A.D.2d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Sullivan v. Sullivan
180 Misc. 2d 433 (New York Supreme Court, 1999)
Harari v. Harari
234 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Shoulson v. Shoulson
203 A.D.2d 974 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Frank v. Frank
82 A.D.2d 908 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 868, 264 N.Y.S.2d 400, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3098, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pustilnik-v-pustilnik-nyappdiv-1965.