Pusey v. Potomac Bridge Co.

8 Md. 470
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedDecember 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 Md. 470 (Pusey v. Potomac Bridge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pusey v. Potomac Bridge Co., 8 Md. 470 (Md. 1855).

Opinion

Mason, J.,

delivered the opinion of this court.

We are of opinion that the materials which were the subject of the present attachment, having been delivered upon the company’s ground, or such other place as was designated by their agent, accepted and paid for by the company in pursuance of the agreement, upon the work having been abandoned by Bowers, (a contingency provided for in the contract,) they became absolutely the property of the company. Under such circumstances it'cannot be successfully contended that “the vendor, mortgagor or donor, remained in possession” of those materials, so far as to defeat the title of the company, or “ to procure to himself credit” in the community, so as to contravene the act of 1729, ch. 8.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Metropolitan Bank of Washington v. Hitz
12 D.C. 111 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Md. 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pusey-v-potomac-bridge-co-md-1855.