Puschelberg

159 Ct. Cl. 589, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 162, 1962 WL 1612
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedNovember 2, 1962
DocketNo. 101-60
StatusPublished

This text of 159 Ct. Cl. 589 (Puschelberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puschelberg, 159 Ct. Cl. 589, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 162, 1962 WL 1612 (cc 1962).

Opinion

Income tax; claims for refund; limitation of actions.— Plaintiffs sued to recover income taxes claimed to have been overpaid for the years 1951 and 1952 on proceeds from the sale or transfer of substantial rights in certain patents owned by them on the ground that by virtue of the Act of June 29, 1956, 70 Stat. 404, plaintiffs were given the right to treat such income as capital gain rather than as ordinary income for income tax purposes. Defendant contended that on the authority of the court’s order in Walter v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 701, the claims for refund were untimely because they were filed more than three years after the returns for the taxable years involved w,ere filed and more than two years after June 29,1956, the date of the enactment of the relief statute relied on, 70 Stat. 404, adding section 117(q) to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition, together with the opposition thereto, and on the basis of the court’s order of July 2,1962, in Walter v. United States, supra; Lorenz v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 751; Zacks v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 814, and the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Smith v. United States, 304 F. 2d 267, the court, on November 2, 1962, dismissed the petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aaron Zacks and Florence Zacks v. United States
280 F.2d 829 (Court of Claims, 1960)
Anton Lorenz and Irene Lorenz v. United States
296 F.2d 746 (Court of Claims, 1961)
Harry B. Smith and Mary L. Smith v. United States
304 F.2d 267 (Third Circuit, 1962)
Walter
158 Ct. Cl. 701 (Court of Claims, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 Ct. Cl. 589, 1962 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 162, 1962 WL 1612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puschelberg-cc-1962.