Puschel v. Hoover

Illinois Supreme Court

Puschel v. Hoover

16 Ill. 340

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedJune 15, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 Ill. 340 (Puschel v. Hoover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Puschel v. Hoover, 16 Ill. 340 (Ill. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

Catón, J.

This action was brought against one of two persons, who were jointly liable for the beer sold. No plea in abatement was filed, but the case was tried upon the general issue, which the court very properly found for the plaintiff, and rendered a judgment thereon. The defendant should have pleaded the non-joinder of his partner in the grocery, and could not take advantage of it upon the trial of the general issue. 1 Chitty’s Pl. 46; Chap. 1, Sec. 3, Rev. Stat.

The judgment must he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Catón, J.

This action was brought against one of two persons, who were jointly liable for the beer sold. No plea in abatement was filed, but the case was tried upon the general issue, which the court very properly found for the plaintiff, and rendered a judgment thereon. The defendant should have pleaded the non-joinder of his partner in the grocery, and could not take advantage of it upon the trial of the general issue. 1 Chitty’s Pl. 46; Chap. 1, Sec. 3, Rev. Stat.

The judgment must he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Ill. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puschel-v-hoover-ill-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack