Puschel v. Hoover

16 Ill. 340
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1855·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Catón, J.

This action was brought against one of two persons, who were jointly liable for the beer sold. No plea in abatement was filed, but the case was tried upon the general issue, which the court very properly found for the plaintiff, and rendered a judgment thereon. The defendant should have pleaded the non-joinder of his partner in the grocery, and could not take advantage of it upon the trial of the general issue. 1 Chitty’s Pl. 46; Chap. 1, Sec. 3, Rev. Stat.

The judgment must he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Puschel v. Hoover, 16 Ill. 340 (Ill. 1855).

16 Ill. 340 (Puschel v. Hoover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

David Rutter & Co. v. McLaughlin
100 N.E. 509 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1912)
David Rutter & Co. v. McLaughlin
169 Ill. App. 430 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
Wilson v. Wilson
125 Ill. App. 385 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1906)
Swannell v. Byers
123 Ill. App. 545 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1905)