Home/Michigan Court of Appeals/Pusakulich v. CITY OF IRONWOOD

Pusakulich v. CITY OF IRONWOOD

635 N.W.2d 328
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pusakulich v. CITY OF IRONWOOD. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 Mich. App. 80 →
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2001·No. 220791·Published

Opinion

635 N.W.2d 328 (2001)

Senia PUSAKULICH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF IRONWOOD, Defendant-Appellee, and
Ross Peterson, d/b/a Ross Peterson Construction, Defendant.

No. 220791.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

August 24, 2001.
Released for Publication October 19, 2001.

Pusakulich v. City of Ironwood, 247 Mich.App. 80, 635 N.W.2d 323. The July 27, 2001, opinion in this matter has been reviewed pursuant to MCR 7 .215(1). A majority of the judges polled have determined that a special panel should not be convened to resolve any potential conflict with Grounds v. Washtenaw Co. Rd. Comm., 204 Mich.App. 453, 516 N.W.2d 87 (1994), and Stabley v. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Park Authority, 228 Mich.App. 363, 579 N.W.2d 374 (1998). Therefore, a special penal will not convene.

McDONALD, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pusakulich v. CITY OF IRONWOOD, 635 N.W.2d 328 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001).

635 N.W.2d 328 (Pusakulich v. CITY OF IRONWOOD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pusakulich v. City of Ironwood
635 N.W.2d 323 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2001)
Dressel v. Ameribank
635 N.W.2d 328 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2001)
Grounds v. Washtenaw County Road Commission
516 N.W.2d 87 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1994)
Stabley v. Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Park Authority
579 N.W.2d 374 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1998)