Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield
692 A.2d 1282, 240 Conn. 926, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 146
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 359 (AC 15166), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Was the trial court correct in setting aside the verdict on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the plaintiff child was subject to imminent harm, an exception to a municipal employee’s immunity from liability when performing discretionary acts?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield, 692 A.2d 1282, 240 Conn. 926, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 146 (Colo. 1997).
692 A.2d 1282 (Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield
708 A.2d 937 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Bonamico v. City of Middletown
706 A.2d 1386 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)