Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield

692 A.2d 1282, 240 Conn. 926, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 146
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 17, 1997
DocketSC 15668
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 692 A.2d 1282 (Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield, 692 A.2d 1282, 240 Conn. 926, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 146 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 359 (AC 15166), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Was the trial court correct in setting aside the verdict on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to prove that the plaintiff child was subject to imminent harm, an exception to a municipal employee’s immunity from liability when performing discretionary acts?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purzycki v. Town of Fairfield
708 A.2d 937 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Bonamico v. City of Middletown
706 A.2d 1386 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 A.2d 1282, 240 Conn. 926, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purzycki-v-town-of-fairfield-conn-1997.