Puryear v. Stansell

76 S.E. 166, 11 Ga. App. 784, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 178
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1912
Docket4298
StatusPublished

This text of 76 S.E. 166 (Puryear v. Stansell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Puryear v. Stansell, 76 S.E. 166, 11 Ga. App. 784, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 178 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. No error of law is complained of, and the evidence on the controlling issue of fact was in direct conflict.

2. The alleged newly discovered testimony was merely cumulative.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E. 166, 11 Ga. App. 784, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/puryear-v-stansell-gactapp-1912.