Purvis v. State

107 S.W. 55, 52 Tex. Crim. 342, 1908 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1908
DocketNo. 4170.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 107 S.W. 55 (Purvis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Purvis v. State, 107 S.W. 55, 52 Tex. Crim. 342, 1908 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6 (Tex. 1908).

Opinion

RAMSEY, Judge.

Appellant was charged by information filed in the county court of Tarrant County, on September 23d last, with unlawfully betting at a game of cards.

The validity of the affidavit and information is questioned for the reason that neither negative the fact that said game was played at a private residence occupied by a family. There is neither statement of facts nor bill of exceptions in the record. If, therefore, the affidavit and information charge an offense against the law, it must follow, under the well-settled rule of this court, that the conviction must be sustained. Under the Act of the Thirtieth Legislature, in respect to gaming, page 107, it is made a misdemeanor for any person to bet or wager any money "at any game of any character whatever that can be played with cards, dice or dominoes.” As we understand this enactment, it makes such wager of money on a game of cards a misdemeanor, and this without reference to where the game is played. This statute does provide, among other things, that "no person shall be indicted under this section for playing said game with dominoes or cards at a private residence occupied by a family,” but it does not excuse or exculpate- one from betting on such a game of cards if played in a private residence or for that matter elsewhere. This is a departure or an addition to the old statute, and it is intended to remedy the evil of gambling without reference to the shelter under which it was done.

Being of the opnion that the affidavit and information charged an offense, and there being neither statement of facts nor bill of exceptions in the record, it follows that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Renfro v. State
199 S.W. 1096 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)
Purvis v. State
137 S.W. 701 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Walters v. State
125 S.W. 11 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Vinson v. State
124 S.W. 652 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Singleton v. State
111 S.W. 736 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.W. 55, 52 Tex. Crim. 342, 1908 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purvis-v-state-texcrimapp-1908.