Purvis v. State
This text of 783 So. 2d 292 (Purvis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jessie Earl PURVIS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Marvin F. Clegg, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, *293 Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. Pate, 656 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). But see Richards v. State, 738 So.2d 415 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We remand for correction of the defendant's scoresheet to reflect 120 points for victim injury. See Poole v. State, 777 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).
COBB, GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
783 So. 2d 292, 2001 WL 256084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/purvis-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.