Purvis v. Social Security Administration

District Court, E.D. Arkansas·Decided August 4, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-00142·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION ROBERT PURVIS PLAINTIFF VS. 3:20-CV-00142-BRW ANDREW M. SAUL DEFENDANT Commissioner, Social Security Administration ORDER Pending is Plaintiff’s unopposed Application for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. No. 22). Since the hours spent by counsel were reasonable, the motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees and costs of $3,426.37. The EAJA fee award is payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel, but subject to any offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt owed to the United States.1 IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of August, 2021. Billy Roy Wilson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2527-28 (2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Purvis v. Social Security Administration, (E.D. Ark. 2021).

Purvis v. Social Security Administration (Purvis v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)